Annexing Hawaii: Was it in Agreement with American Ideals about Freedom?

Annexing Hawaii has been a subject of debate and controversy for many years. The United States` acquisition of the Hawaiian Islands in 1898 has long been regarded as a significant event in American history. However, the question remains whether the annexation of Hawaii was in agreement with American ideals about freedom.

Many people argue that annexing Hawaii went against the principles of freedom on which America was founded. The annexation occurred during the period of American imperialism when the US was seeking to expand its territory and influence globally. Some have criticized this expansionist policy as a violation of Hawaii`s sovereignty and an infringement on the freedom of its people.

The Hawaiian Islands were initially a sovereign nation, and its monarchy had maintained its independence for many years. However, when the US expanded its military presence in the Pacific, it became increasingly interested in Hawaii`s strategic location. In 1893, Queen Liliuokalani, the last monarch of Hawaii, was overthrown by a group of American businessmen who established a provisional government. The Queen`s attempt to restore the monarchy was unsuccessful, and Hawaii remained under American control.

The annexation of Hawaii was seen by many as a betrayal of American values. The US had always championed democracy, self-determination, and individual rights, and the annexation of Hawaii was seen as an act of imperialism that contradicted these principles. The annexation was also criticized for being carried out without the consent of the Hawaiians, who were denied the opportunity to participate in the decision-making process.

On the other hand, some argue that the annexation of Hawaii was consistent with American ideals of freedom and democracy. They point out that the US had a duty to protect American interests in the Pacific and that the Hawaiian Islands were strategically valuable. They also argue that the annexation brought Hawaii under the protection of American law, allowing Hawaiians to enjoy the benefits of American citizenship.

Moreover, some see the annexation as the natural result of America`s Manifest Destiny, the belief that the US was destined to spread its influence across the continent and beyond. They argue that the annexation of Hawaii was a logical step in the expansion of the American empire.

In conclusion, the annexation of Hawaii was a complex event that continues to divide opinion today. While some see it as a betrayal of American values, others view it as consistent with America`s long-standing policy of expansion and protection of its interests. Both sides agree that the annexation of Hawaii had a profound impact on the Hawaiian people and their culture. Even today, the question of whether annexing Hawaii was in agreement with American ideals about freedom remains an open one.